Closed rikhuijzer closed 2 years ago
Oops PR against wrong repo. This is still a work in progress.
The test almost works: https://github.com/rikhuijzer/cache-artifacts/pull/2. I'll fix it within a few days.
Sounds great, please add yourself to the authors as well since you've already done more work than I have for this action :D
All tests pass now :partying_face: (see https://github.com/rikhuijzer/cache-artifacts/pull/2)
Some notes:
To ensure that each run stores a new cache, I've had to make the restore-keys more strict. The original idea of those keys was probably that the Artifacts system can handle files for different versions perfectly fine, so more files is better. I wonder now in what kind of situation these stricter restore-keys make a difference. I think it should be fine
I think originally they were based on the example GitHub provided rather than Julia-specific. Should be fine with stricter keys too.
@SaschaMann could you enable GitHub Actions on this repository?
Done
Apparently closing and reopening doesn't trigger CI anymore, could you push an empty commit or so to trigger it?
Apparently closing and reopening doesn't trigger CI anymore, could you push an empty commit or so to trigger it?
Doesn't seem to work. I guess we first need to get this .github/workflow/
into main?
Tests passed again for a6f12e0, see https://github.com/rikhuijzer/cache-artifacts/pull/4.
Adds tests via a workflow in this repository.