Closed DilumAluthge closed 2 years ago
x64 Julia binaries on, e.g., an aarch64 runner wouldn't work at all, would they?
I'd not consider it a breaking change because I can't think of any situation where this would break a build that previously worked.
x64 Julia binaries on, e.g., an aarch64 runner wouldn't work at all, would they?
Well, if you are on macOS aarch64, and you download an x86_64 binary, you can run that binary using Rosetta 2.
you can run that binary using Rosetta 2.
Does it do that automatically? The action runs julia --version
, would that work using Rosetta 2 or would it fail?
(I know nothing about macOS)
That said, it would only affect self-hosted runners which are somewhat unsupportedish and I think we could feasibly make the argument that a default of x64 on aarch64 runners was a bug to begin with since that seems like a special case rather than what you'd reasonably expect to be the default case.
Does it do that automatically? The action runs
julia --version
, would that work using Rosetta 2 or would it fail?
I checked with Elliot, and he confirmed that yes, it will automatically use Rosetta 2.
Yeah, I think we can justify this PR as a bug fix with the argument you made above:
a default of x64 on aarch64 runners was a bug to begin with
@SaschaMann Would you consider this to be a breaking change? Or could we feasibly argue that this is a bug fix?