Open mitchphillipson opened 2 weeks ago
I'm generally in favour of more articulation and flexibility, so e.g. I'd rather have
e: E q:Q*RATE
than either
e: E q:Q r:RATE
or
@endowment(E, Q, ration= RATE)
I think it's clearer to read, and interpret, and allows other operations. There's some economics in there (MPSGE/GAMS construction) that suggests those particular combinations, but I don't think it's necessary to lock those in. Better to provide documentation on the economic intuition of those, but leave open other possibilities for users to construct.
We can discuss.
Adding a reference back to #100 to make sure we have that clearly in mind for all this.
Endowments
In MPSGE there is syntax of the form
This is equivalent to
We should add a keyword to the endowment constructor of the form
This is the same as #100
Taxes
It's possible in a netput to have something of the form
This is equivalent to
N stands for endogenous and M for multplier
Productivity Externality
Currently in MPSGE we must do
It would be preferable to have syntax of the form