Closed ScottWeinstein closed 10 years ago
Can you point me to why that isn't sufficient?
Thanks!
No seriously :D
lawyers are silly creatures
Can you point me to why that isn't sufficient?
IANAL and all that, but I think their reasoning is that "License: MIT" is sufficient for a casual understanding of the rules, but since the letters M I T don't describe the actual terms and conditions, it doesn't meet their needs.
I wonder why it's fine to have one per repo but not have the license in each file etc, weird rules
Would it be possible to include a LICENSE file with the text of the license agreement? Our lawyers are saying that just having "License: MIT" is not sufficient.