Fairly generic, visual design could be pushed more
Quality layouts and unique, personable content & design
Unique and recognizable as you, with engaging, personable content & design
Text content
Fake content only
Some real content, some fake
All real content but with lots of errors
Real content, well written, no grammar or spelling errors
Accessibility
No considerations
Added some alt attributes, nothing else
Just the basics: alt attributes, roles
Accessibility is well considered and tested
Pages & images
Barely started
Missing lots of pages & images
Has most of the pages, some placeholder images
All pages exist and are well done with complete imagery
Image quality
Only placeholder images
Some portfolio piece images
Lots of images but low quality
High quality portfolio images — and lots of them
Responsiveness
Not responsive
Works on some screens
Responsive but with lots of awkwardness
Looks great on all screen sizes
Performance
Mega slow…
Slow…
Could load faster
Blazing fast awesomeness
JavaScript (If it exists)
Completely broken
Semi-functional
Works okay but the non-JavaScript experience is better
Very much improves the experience
Code quality
Barely started
Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics
Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics
Well indented, fully valid, good semantics
2.5 - 2.5 - 3 - 1 - 3 - 3 - 2.5 - 2.5 - n/a - 2.5
25.5/30
One thing I struggled with this term was collecting all of the images of my portfolio artwork that I needed and organizing them into a pleasing format. Another challenge for me was using the md files and the include system because my site was done differently from last term and I found it very complicated. I applied what I learned this term and all past terms to figure out these challenges. In the future, I could improve this site by using more than one page as there is a ton of content here and doing this would increase organization.
I've given myself 25.5 out of 30 points because my site is fairly detailed with lots of well grided images and hover states, the design represents me well and is consistent throughout the whole website, the text content is well written, edited and easy to understand, there are plenty of mid to high quality images, it's responsive on all screens, it's pretty fast to load, and finally the code quality is above acceptable.
www.julianredmond.ca
(If it exists)
2.5 - 2.5 - 3 - 1 - 3 - 3 - 2.5 - 2.5 - n/a - 2.5
25.5/30
One thing I struggled with this term was collecting all of the images of my portfolio artwork that I needed and organizing them into a pleasing format. Another challenge for me was using the md files and the include system because my site was done differently from last term and I found it very complicated. I applied what I learned this term and all past terms to figure out these challenges. In the future, I could improve this site by using more than one page as there is a ton of content here and doing this would increase organization.
I've given myself 25.5 out of 30 points because my site is fairly detailed with lots of well grided images and hover states, the design represents me well and is consistent throughout the whole website, the text content is well written, edited and easy to understand, there are plenty of mid to high quality images, it's responsive on all screens, it's pretty fast to load, and finally the code quality is above acceptable.
@thomasjbradley