julianredmond / julianredmond.ca

The starter portfolio repository, basically empty, but with a few helper files.
https://angry-jackson-0923ea.netlify.com/pattern-library/#brand
0 stars 0 forks source link

Pattern Library - Peer Evaluation #4

Open lolasundara opened 4 years ago

lolasundara commented 4 years ago

Your brand is nice and clean with great use of contrasting colours! Your usability is very straight forward and easy to recognize for your users as everything is responsive and expands smoothly. The quality of the project and your code is simplified, allowing for you to make easy changes and locate different sections if need be, good job. A couple things to consider for your design execution on the patterns:

Cards: The cards are all responsive and are balanced throughout all sizes of screens. The text however, does run a bit long on the larger sizes so if you want to minimize that consider using a max-width so the text cuts and runs on the line below (if you prefer).

Footer: I like your icons, they add a nice visual compliment to your contact infos. Consider adding a top margin or "pad-t" to separate them a bit more. You can also use "text-center" to even out the spacing to align perfectly with the icon.

0 points 1 points 2 points 3 points
Creativeness Bland, boring Fairly generic, but the colours are nice Good, works very well and is unique enough Wow! I never would have thought that would work so well!
Effectiveness I don’t know what this is trying to do The message isn’t completely clear and it’s difficult to use It’s obvious and simple to use The project is super effective and easy to use
Quality Non-existent Acceptable quality, more work could be done Good quality, up to the expectations of the teacher Stunning quality, this person rocks!
Effort Zero effort, incomplete Decent amount of effort Goodly amount of effort that shows Amazing, over-the-top amount of effort
Code quality Barely started Indentation is barely existent, lots of validation errors, very poor semantics Decent indentation, just a couple validation errors, decent semantics Well indented, fully valid, good semantics

Sum the rubric and put that value at the bottom.

Your grade for the project is tallied to 13/15