Closed YaoDongJi closed 7 months ago
@YaoDongJi If you use Mysql 5.7version Use 0.45.1 version
您好,我已收到邮件 。 收件人:姚东济
You can try using PyPy instead of the standard python interpreter this is normally faster.
Le lun. 29 janv. 2024 à 06:22, YaoDongJi @.***> a écrit :
您好,我已收到邮件 。 收件人:姚东济
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/julien-duponchelle/python-mysql-replication/issues/603#issuecomment-1913983745, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACUKXIXEDNFDJL3ZQHRROLYQ4W2HAVCNFSM6AAAAABCNECBVCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMJTHE4DGNZUGU . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <julien-duponchelle/python-mysql-replication/issues/603/1913983745@ github.com>
@YaoDongJi If you use Mysql 5.7version Use 0.45.1 version
thanks, we will try this version
You can try using PyPy instead of the standard python interpreter this is normally faster. Le lun. 29 janv. 2024 à 06:22, YaoDongJi @.***> a écrit : … 您好,我已收到邮件 。 收件人:姚东济 — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#603 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACUKXIXEDNFDJL3ZQHRROLYQ4W2HAVCNFSM6AAAAABCNECBVCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMJTHE4DGNZUGU . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <julien-duponchelle/python-mysql-replication/issues/603/1913983745@ github.com>
We are currently using pypy3.7. Currently, we have observed a maximum of 10000 tps per second, corresponding to approximately 10MB of data. We would like to ask for some observation indicators that can be used as a reference to help us confirm whether there is still room for performance improvement.
@YaoDongJi we don't maintain this for mysql5.7 anymore, but I can put this feature in 0.45.2 if you want ?
n 0.45.2
Yes, performance improvement is really needed. Thank you very much for your help. We will test the performance of this version after merging this feature.
Could you please help us merge this feature into version 0.30? I checked and found that we are using version 0.30, and I compared the performance of 0.45.1 and version 0.30, and found that 0.30 will perform better than 0.45.1, thanks.
@YaoDongJi Need 0.30.1 or 0.31.1?
@YaoDongJi Need 0.30.1 or 0.31.1?
0.30.1 would be better.
@YaoDongJi released 0.30.1 Let me know if you have any problems
@YaoDongJi released 0.30.1 Let me know if you have any problems
We will test this soon,thanks
Version
Please specify the versions you are using. Exact version numbers are preferred.
Symptoms
We are currently using 0.31 as our production version, but we have encountered a performance bottleneck with a processing speed of 60m/s. Is the latest version compatible with version 0.31? Can we improve performance by upgrading the version?