An in-range update of eslint-plugin-jest is breaking the build 🚨

[greenkeeper[bot]]

The devDependency eslint-plugin-jest was updated from 21.24.1 to 21.24.2.

🚨 View failing branch.

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

eslint-plugin-jest is a devDependency of this project. It might not break your production code or affect downstream projects, but probably breaks your build or test tools, which may prevent deploying or publishing.

Status Details

- ❌ **continuous-integration/travis-ci/push:** The Travis CI build failed ([Details](https://travis-ci.org/bazzite/statusfy/builds/441244381?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification)).

---

Release Notes for v21.24.2

21.24.2 (2018-10-14)

Bug Fixes

• expect-expect: support MemberExpressions in assertFunctionNames (#176) (9466959), closes #175

Commits

The new version differs by 4 commits.

• 9466959 fix(expect-expect): support MemberExpressions in assertFunctionNames (#176)
• 0276985 refactor(expect-expect): use ESQuery selector syntax (#171)
• be29fba refactor(prefer-expect-assertions): use ESQuery selectors (#170)
• 6fa003b refactor(no-disabled-tests): use ESQuery selector syntax (#169)

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of [frequently asked questions](https://greenkeeper.io/faq.html). If those don’t help, you can always [ask the humans behind Greenkeeper](https://github.com/greenkeeperio/greenkeeper/issues/new).

---

Your Greenkeeper Bot :palm_tree:

[greenkeeper[bot]]

After pinning to 21.24.1 your tests are still failing. The reported issue might not affect your project. These imprecisions are caused by inconsistent test results.

[greenkeeper[bot]]

• The devDependency eslint-plugin-jest was updated from 21.24.2 to 21.25.0.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare changes

Release Notes for v21.25.0

21.25.0 (2018-10-14)

Features

• add prefer-to-contain rule (#174) (83a4c48), closes #100

Commits

The new version differs by 1 commits.

• 83a4c48 feat: add prefer-to-contain rule (#174)

See the full diff