Open jundatan opened 1 year ago
Indeed that the full text message of the output is cut off, however the intentions of putting the output is to show the users that the user should be looking out for the output that indicates that the event is "Succesfully linked!..." and the rest of the output is not relevant as it is subjective to the events that the users have input already in their event book.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: This part is not subjective at all. It is clearly cut off and there is suppose to be more details to it. The reader will want to see the full output like in the other examples of the UG. I am displeased that this is an obvious problem but not considered accepted as it is clearly inconsistency in the UG. At least a warning sign that the output is incomplete would be a better and sufficient option if the team wants to rebut it in this way.
The linkcontact example part for the UG is either cut off or missing and it does not display the entire text.