Closed tigerinus closed 1 year ago
Thanks for the suggestion, but I'm not a fish user and I'm not well-versed in its non-standard scripting facility. So, no, I'm not interested in supporting it.
Would you accept a PR if someone ported it to fish?
It depends on the complexity of the code. Once I merge the code, I take on the burden of maintaining the code from then on.
AFAIK fish has far better readability than Shell or Bash, similar to Python. Only it lacks few "advanced" features Bash has got e.g. dictionaries. In its documentation there is even a dedicated section fish for Bash users. I could imagine porting your code to fish.
I could imagine porting your code to fish.
Are you interested in doing that?
I'd give it a try at least. Can't promise anything though!
Would be awesome to support fish. Thanks!