Closed chrisjsewell closed 2 years ago
In unified-myst I currently use name, e.g. for {name}`content`, rather than kind
unified-myst
name
{name}`content`
kind
This also syncs with: https://github.com/syntax-tree/mdast-util-directive/blob/4c494b18ac31f27f67b95b917aacc03207d9584f/complex-types.d.ts#L7
Any major objections to changing that here @rowanc1 @fwkoch?
This is for directive names? That sounds fine.
For admonitions, I think we still have a type=admonition, and kind=warning, because those are enums that are well defined?
kind=warning
In
unified-myst
I currently usename
, e.g. for{name}`content`
, rather thankind
This also syncs with: https://github.com/syntax-tree/mdast-util-directive/blob/4c494b18ac31f27f67b95b917aacc03207d9584f/complex-types.d.ts#L7
Any major objections to changing that here @rowanc1 @fwkoch?