In today's SSC meeting, we discussed defining (and explicitly documenting) "suggested" time lengths for the RFC and voting periods. This encourages the SSC to review proposals in a timely manner and it helps JEP authors have a sense of the level of engagement they should expect before committing the energy to drafting a JEP.
Historically, JEPs have been left open indefinitely; I think this discourages folks from submitting JEPs. I'm hoping to improve this experience.
I mentioned in today's meeting that aiming for a total ~6 week time seems reasonable (though open to discussion here) for a proposal to be opened until final vote is reached. I was thinking 4 weeks for RFC and 2 weeks for voting. These specific numbers are meant to be guidelines; the actual timeframes should be set by the JEP shepherd. If a JEP's impact is larger, the time for each phase can be extended. Otherwise, the JEP defaults to these time periods.
I'm planning to submit a PR to our documentation with these details later this week but wanted to give folks a chance to comment before that.
In today's SSC meeting, we discussed defining (and explicitly documenting) "suggested" time lengths for the RFC and voting periods. This encourages the SSC to review proposals in a timely manner and it helps JEP authors have a sense of the level of engagement they should expect before committing the energy to drafting a JEP.
Historically, JEPs have been left open indefinitely; I think this discourages folks from submitting JEPs. I'm hoping to improve this experience.
I mentioned in today's meeting that aiming for a total ~6 week time seems reasonable (though open to discussion here) for a proposal to be opened until final vote is reached. I was thinking 4 weeks for RFC and 2 weeks for voting. These specific numbers are meant to be guidelines; the actual timeframes should be set by the JEP shepherd. If a JEP's impact is larger, the time for each phase can be extended. Otherwise, the JEP defaults to these time periods.
I'm planning to submit a PR to our documentation with these details later this week but wanted to give folks a chance to comment before that.