jupyterhub / zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s

Helm Chart & Documentation for deploying JupyterHub on Kubernetes
https://zero-to-jupyterhub.readthedocs.io
Other
1.56k stars 798 forks source link

Planning for release 4.0 with JupyterHub 5 #3406

Open consideRatio opened 6 months ago

consideRatio commented 6 months ago

Wishes before we cut 4.0.0-beta.1

Notes for upgrade guide

KubeSpawner has a breaking change that we should describe for users with a z2jh context with various configurations (Users with NFS home folders for example should be aware for example).

manics commented 6 months ago

I'd like us to write migration docs, similar to what was discussed in https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyterhub/issues/4787, for 3->4 (and for for 2->3 if I get time for completeness). The changelog has to be concise, whereas an upgrade guide can give more context and focus on what (if anything) is important. It's also a place to highlight breaking changes in subcomponents, at the moment we just refer to the component's changelog but the time saved here ends up being spent on providing support on Discourse.

johnpmayer commented 6 months ago

I would love to see a new release of jupyterhub/traefik-proxy, in particular for Redis support. I don't know if this is directly tied to 5.0 though.

EDIT by @consideRatio: note that jupyterhub/traefik-proxy is used by jupyterhub/the-littlest-jupyterhub, but not by jupyterhub/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s

consideRatio commented 6 months ago

@manics about migration docs - I think its entirely in scope to write migration docs about breaking changes in helm chart config etc, but I'd prefer if we don't write migration docs about for example how to migrate oauthenticator config but instead link out to upstream projects.

Looking at the changelog for v3, its mostly upstream things so adding a migration for v3 would not include much then - and for z2jh v4, we also won't have much. I think it can make sense to add an almost empty migration entry describing that though.

image

What do you think?

Ph0tonic commented 6 months ago

I think that it could be great if a major version with the following breaking change was released for KubeSpawner, and then directly incorporated in this major version of z2jh.

manics commented 6 months ago

I think we should document significant breaking changes in subprojects in the upgrade guide. The subproject changelogs are aimed at developers and admins who are very familiar with JupyterHub, but Z2JH (and TLJH) are higher level. They're aimed at system administrators who may not be as familiar with JupyterHub.

For example, the OAuthenticator change to denying all users by default caught several people out. I'm happy to work on the upgrade docs when I get time.

consideRatio commented 5 months ago

Kube scheduler should be bumped to 1.29 as well i think (DONE: Bumped to 1.30, since 1.31 is now out)

consideRatio commented 1 month ago

4.0.0-beta.1 is now released, and I posted https://discourse.jupyter.org/t/jupyterhub-helm-chart-4-0-0-beta-1-is-out/28828

benz0li commented 1 month ago

Wish before you release 4.0.0 (App version > 5.1.0?):