Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I don't know about this.
First off, the first hunk in the patch doesn't really help, I think (and it
looks like it's completely untested; there's a reference to "doc" there that
doesn't make sense).
For the delete() method, IMO just updating the _rev doesn't really make sense.
If anything, we should modify the doc so that it only has _id, _rev and
_deleted=True, to correctly represent the state of the doc in the database at
that point.
Original comment by djc.ochtman
on 22 Dec 2010 at 11:57
Upload a better path with test
Original comment by daevaorn
on 13 Mar 2011 at 11:45
Attachments:
Actually, Document will be never False because it's dict like and always
filled, so may be using __nonzero__ (__bool__) method will be more pythonic
instead of deleted property?
>>> if doc:
>>> ...
>>> if not doc.deleted:
>>> ...
Original comment by kxepal
on 14 Mar 2011 at 9:35
I don't think so. Only empty dict ({}) is False. Deleted document isn't empty.
It has some special state with additional attribute but not empty.
Just now I try to make one more patch for this ticket with more specific
deletion handling especially in `couchdb.mapping.Document`.
Original comment by daevaorn
on 14 Mar 2011 at 9:43
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
Upload a better patch with `mapping.Document` handling of the deleted documents
that come from views.
Original comment by daevaorn
on 14 Mar 2011 at 9:59
Attachments:
Empty dict is False, yes, but this is Document object which must have _id and
_rev keys if it exists. Document is high-level dict so, why not to have it
high-level boolean conversion logic: return False if it deleter or no more
existed and True otherwise?
However, even if it will be empty (as dict), id and rev properties will
generate KeyError exception and you'll still unable to print it.
Original comment by kxepal
on 15 Mar 2011 at 2:38
This issue has been migrated to GitHub. Please continue discussion here:
https://github.com/djc/couchdb-python/issues/155
Original comment by djc.ochtman
on 15 Jul 2014 at 7:19
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
daevaorn
on 30 Sep 2010 at 5:30Attachments: