search

just3obad / smartsoft-12

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/smartsoft-12
0 stars 0 forks source link

4.10: As an admin, I can view the top interests. #102

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Success scenarios:
"A comparison between interests are done as a pie chart showing interests that 
are accessed and liked the most.A diagram of top interests will appear and on 
clicking on one of them a dialogue appears viewing the a graph of the 
statistics of this 
specific interest over the last 30 days. "

Failure scenarios:
1- There are no enough interest tags created to show the top interests in this 
case we will show all the interests we have on system.
2- Those of the top interests were not created in a period >=30 so we will only 
show statistics of its age.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by diab...@gmail.com on 10 May 2012 at 9:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
See issue 115 for ranking scheme..

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 12 May 2012 at 7:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 12 May 2012 at 1:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1113.

adding tests

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 12 May 2012 at 9:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 12 May 2012 at 10:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 13 May 2012 at 9:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Leh keda? Makanet kwayesa!

Original comment by guc@sakr.me on 13 May 2012 at 9:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I thought I should move the tests from integration tests to functional
tests the ones regarding the view ama ba check div aw list
shouldn't I ?

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 13 May 2012 at 9:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 13 May 2012 at 9:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1288.

adding backend methods with doc

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 13 May 2012 at 8:01

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1297.

adding pie chart to the all interests statistics view

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 13 May 2012 at 9:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1431.

editing working tests , removing RED

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 15 May 2012 at 4:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1432.

adding removed associations , fixing calling the graphs in the view

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 15 May 2012 at 4:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1445.

adding method to get top ranked interests and listing them in the view

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 15 May 2012 at 5:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
updated Scenarios
Success scenarios:
"A comparison between top 5 interests are done as a pie chart showing interests 
that are added or having stories the most.A list of top interests and there 
ranks will appear and on clicking on one of them the admin will be redirected 
to the statistics page of the statistics of this specific interest over the 
last 30 days. "

Failure scenarios:
1- There are no interest in the system created to show the top interests in 
this case an error message will appear.
2- no interest could be ranked because all of them don't have any users or 
stories so an error message will appear.

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 15 May 2012 at 6:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1452.

editing view

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 15 May 2012 at 6:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1469.

adding UML

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 15 May 2012 at 7:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 15 May 2012 at 7:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1536.

editing style (components instead of a table)

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 16 May 2012 at 12:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1538.

editing style

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 16 May 2012 at 1:26

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1539.

editing style

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 16 May 2012 at 1:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by mohamed....@gmail.com on 18 May 2012 at 9:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by mohamed....@gmail.com on 18 May 2012 at 9:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1709.

moving view tests to functional tests

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 18 May 2012 at 11:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 18 May 2012 at 4:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
see r1445 and other revisions indenting your code and return it back to 
code-ready

Original comment by christin...@gmail.com on 19 May 2012 at 12:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
see r1539

Original comment by christin...@gmail.com on 19 May 2012 at 12:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Please check the comments on the UML in revision 1469..

Removing the label UML-Ready after commenting..

Original comment by lydia.si...@gmail.com on 19 May 2012 at 2:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Documentation should be in the format:
= begin
Method description
Parameters (inputs, outputs)
Author: Diab
= end
In addition to simple in line documentation to inside the methods if possible

Original comment by mohamed....@gmail.com on 19 May 2012 at 2:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
-(Nothing But a Design Issue ) When there is no users adding this certain 
Interest  , why is it in a form of a Red flash "Warning" ? ... maybe a 
notifying blue/orange message would be nice .

-What if ? ... this Interest is blocked ? ... i think it would be better if 
there is a label beside each interest indicating whether it's blocked or not .

Original comment by jailan.s...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 11:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1962.

adding UML

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 12:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
the format =begin , =end 
causes a compiler error with me , u sure of this ?

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 1:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
if you checked you're gonna find out that my docs matches this format except 
for the begin end thing

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 1:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1979.

fixing reviewers comments

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 2:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1987.

adding labels indicating the status of the interest in the list

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 3:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1992.

updating tests for the new authentication system

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 4:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by mohamed....@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 4:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by lydia.si...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 7:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r2022.

editing UML

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 7:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by christin...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 8:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by lydia.si...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 9:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
can the div with id ccc have a more descriptive name?!

Original comment by mostafa....@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 10:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
There are no Tests for failure scenarios

Original comment by mostafa....@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 11:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r2159.

moving some tests and making them pass

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 12:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r2222.

adding test for failure scenario , and changing the chart div id to a 
meaningful name

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 12:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by jailan.s...@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 8:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by mostafa....@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 8:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by yahiaelg...@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 11:13