search

just3obad / smartsoft-12

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/smartsoft-12
0 stars 0 forks source link

4.31: As an admin I can view the list of users who added a certain interest #104

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Success scenarios:
clicking the interest statistics page a list of user components shall appear 
containing a list of users who added this interest

Failure scenarios:
no user added this interest , a message should appear indicating this

Original issue reported on code.google.com by diab...@gmail.com on 10 May 2012 at 9:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 12 May 2012 at 1:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1114.

adding tests and editing fixture

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 12 May 2012 at 9:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1118.

adding user add interest association

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 12 May 2012 at 10:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 12 May 2012 at 10:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 13 May 2012 at 9:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 13 May 2012 at 9:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1290.

adding backend method with doc

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 13 May 2012 at 8:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1436.

 removing RED from working tests

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 15 May 2012 at 4:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1470.

adding UML

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 15 May 2012 at 7:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1484.

editing view

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 15 May 2012 at 8:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1617.

updating tests with new routes , naming the div  and removing RED

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 17 May 2012 at 10:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1709.

moving view tests to functional tests

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 18 May 2012 at 11:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 18 May 2012 at 4:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
 see r1484
and indent all your code please...

Original comment by christin...@gmail.com on 19 May 2012 at 1:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Documentation should be in the format:
= begin
Method description
Parameters (inputs, outputs)
Author: Diab
= end
In addition to simple in line documentation to inside the methods if possible

Original comment by mohamed....@gmail.com on 19 May 2012 at 2:36

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Please check the comments on the UML in revision 1470..

Removing the label UML-Ready after commenting..

Original comment by lydia.si...@gmail.com on 19 May 2012 at 2:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 

-When some users are de-activated  it doesn't tell whether that are 
de-activated or not , also it counts them normally with the Active users , i 
think it would be better if there is a label beside each user indicating 
whether he is deactivated or not .

Original comment by jailan.s...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 11:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1965.

adding UML

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 12:55

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
the deactivated users might reactivate later , here we get the activity of the 
interest 3ala madar el wa2t la2n 7ata el deactivated users 3mlo add lel 
interest dah w dy 7aga tt7sblo y3ny , w ana shayf en including el deactivated 
users makes more sense
as for the labels am gonna try working on it

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 1:06

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1981.

fixing reviewers comments

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 2:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1989.

adding labels indicating the status of the user in the list

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 3:20

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r1992.

updating tests for the new authentication system

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 4:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by mohamed....@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 4:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by lydia.si...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 7:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r2024.

editing UML

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 7:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by christin...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 8:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by lydia.si...@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 9:36

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
There are no tests for the failure scenarios

Original comment by mostafa....@gmail.com on 20 May 2012 at 11:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r2159.

moving some tests and making them pass

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 12:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
This issue was updated by revision r2204.

adding test for failure scenario

Original comment by diab...@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 11:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by jailan.s...@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 8:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by mostafa....@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 8:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by yahiaelg...@gmail.com on 23 May 2012 at 11:14