Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2012 at 1:46
This issue was updated by revision r1132.
adding unit tests for model
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2012 at 10:49
This issue was updated by revision r1134.
adding integration tests to test view
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2012 at 10:59
This issue was updated by revision r1136.
add integration tests to test routes
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2012 at 11:02
Update Issue 92
Labels: Test-Ready
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 12 May 2012 at 11:03
This issue was updated by revision r1250.
Adding routes to my methods
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2012 at 4:06
This issue was updated by revision r1255.
adding methods to controller and removing my old methods
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2012 at 4:31
This issue was updated by revision r1256.
adding methods to model
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2012 at 4:36
This issue was updated by revision r1258.
small change in test to create user correctly, tests passed, removed red word
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2012 at 4:48
This issue was updated by revision r1264.
routing tests pass, removed red word
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 13 May 2012 at 5:14
This issue was updated by revision r1369.
removing commented line (not needed)
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2012 at 10:07
This issue was updated by revision r1388.
Adding UML
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2012 at 11:06
Original comment by christin...@gmail.com
on 14 May 2012 at 11:18
This issue was updated by revision r1472.
correcting very silly mistake in method block interest
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 15 May 2012 at 7:53
Update Issue 92
Labels: Test-Ready Code-Ready UML-Ready Doc-Ready Scenario-Ready
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 15 May 2012 at 9:35
This issue was updated by revision r1513.
all tests pass, remove red keyword
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 15 May 2012 at 10:08
-he user<<actor>> should have a actor shape (check 1.2.png or 1.5.png to get
what i mean. i did them on www.cacoo.com if you want to use it )
Original comment by omar.sae...@gmail.com
on 16 May 2012 at 6:41
This issue was updated by revision r1643.
updating message inserted in log file
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 17 May 2012 at 5:27
The success and failure scenario of this story will be updated to accommodate
for the newly added feature unblock a story
Success scenarios:
Under each story in the read more page, there are 2 buttons one to block this
story and one to block all stories belonging to this interest. After the user
chooses, a message appears that it was blocked and the story or all stories
will be removed. The user is redirected to the main feed.
From the settings page, the user can click on button manage blocked stories
which redirects the user to the list of his blocked stories. Then, he can
choose to unblock one and a message appears it was successful and he is
redirected to the main feed.
Failure scenarios:
If the story is not available anymore or removed, a pop up window will appear
saying that the story was removed. If the user has no blocked stories,a message
notifies him that there are no blocked stories.
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 7:10
This issue was updated by revision r1785.
Adding method for unblock feature in controller
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 7:13
This issue was updated by revision r1786.
adding method to unblock story in model
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 7:17
This issue was updated by revision r1787.
adding routes for unblock feature
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 7:19
This issue was updated by revision r1792.
adding view to see blocked stories list (unblock feature)
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 7:30
This issue was updated by revision r1795.
adding functional tests for unblock story feature
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 7:35
This issue was updated by revision r1796.
adding tests for unblock story feature
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 7:36
This issue was updated by revision r1797.
adding unit tests for unblock story feature
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 7:38
Original comment by kelbhaey
on 19 May 2012 at 3:00
After talking to SAKR we reached these guidelines to make a proper
documentation.
First of all we will stick to that format of documentation for the whole
company.
=begin
Description:
Input:
Output:
Author:
=end
#Plus an inline documentation before each step u do inside that method
#for Views Please Document the Important parts of code & give an overview
about what this View does Exactly.
#For extra Help : Refer to my Actions in User Model. [after i commit for sure]
Original comment by kemoo...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2012 at 3:47
see r1256
Original comment by christin...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2012 at 7:45
Also see r1786
Original comment by christin...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2012 at 7:53
see r1792
Original comment by christin...@gmail.com
on 19 May 2012 at 7:56
[deleted comment]
My numbers mean the following :
1) Check that it compiles.
2)Check that it complies with the naming convention
3) Check that each assert has a description (message)
and there's a note section.
Functional/users_controller_test.rb
test_get_block_story:
1) T
2) test_should_redirect_on_block_story
3) message : redirects on successful story block
test_get_block_interest:
1) T
2) test_should_redirect_on_block_interest
3) message : redirects on successful interest block
test_get_manage_blocked_stories_list:
1) T
2) test_should_get_manage_blocked_stories_list
3) assert messages
test_get_unblock_story:
1) T
2) test_should_redirect_on_unblock_story
3) assert message
Integration/user_test.rb
routes : I tried them all, they all work, please rename them to :
test_should_get......
Integration/story_test.rb
test_form_for_button_block_interest_in_read_more_RED:
1) F
2) test_should_view_block_interest_button_in_read_more
3) assert messages
Notes : replace the placeholder read_more_path(this_story) with the
stories#get route
test_form_for_button_block_story_in_read_more_RED:
1) F
2) test_should_view_block_story_button_in_read_more
3) assert messages
Notes : replace the placeholder read_more_path(this_story) with the
stories#get route
Unit/user_test.rb
test_user_wants_to_block_interest:
1) T
2) test_interest_should_be_blocked
3) assert messages
test_user_wants_to_block_story:
1) T
2) test_user_should_be_blocked
3) assert messages
test_user_wants_to_unblock_story:
1) T
2) test_should_unblock_story
3) assert messages
test_user_wants_to_get_blocked_stories_list:
1) T
2) test_should_return_blocked_stories_list
3) assert messages
Please note that this is the defensive part of your review (meaning that this
is the stuff that you've written) I've yet to check if there is need for an
offensive test review in your code.
Original comment by mina.ade...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 1:38
This issue was updated by revision r1896.
adding correct format of documentation, fixed indentation
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 8:35
This issue was updated by revision r1897.
adding correct format of documentation, fixed indentation
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 8:36
This issue was updated by revision r1898.
fixed indentation, added documentation in the view
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 8:37
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 8:39
This issue was updated by revision r1902.
fixing a typo
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 9:06
This issue was updated by revision r1903.
fixing relations to block_interest and block_story
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 9:07
This issue was updated by revision r1994.
adding new umls to accomodate new features
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 5:28
This issue was updated by revision r1997.
deleting old UML
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 5:35
@omar : i did not redo it on cacoo since it will be tough to do them on a new
tool unless it is necessary and the whole company will do that. In the lecture,
it is done the way top coder does it, so why change it?
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 5:44
Original comment by christin...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 8:32
This issue was updated by revision r2051.
fixing functional tests
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 9:29
This issue was updated by revision r2054.
fixed integration tests
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 9:31
This issue was updated by revision r2055.
fixed unit tests in user_test
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 9:34
This issue was updated by revision r2056.
remove unnecessary tests
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 9:46
This issue was updated by revision r2057.
adding assert messages to tests
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 9:50
@mina: done with all your comments but note that I removed the two tests in the
story controller since I was going to remove them anyway, I did not do the view
for the button so I can not test them. omar should test these two buttons in
testing his views
Original comment by rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2012 at 9:53
just one change
please remove the wish to block interest/story since you added under it "click
on block"
Original comment by omar.sae...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2012 at 3:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rana.hel...@gmail.com
on 10 May 2012 at 1:25