Open justinethier opened 3 years ago
Hi @justinethier. It would be awesome! Also the possibility to introduce C macros directly would be great.
I was wondering about the name of a new construct and thought of c-verbatim
or c-raw
. Anyway, I am not sure if the actual c-code
functionality would even be required/used, so we could just change its behavior. Just random ideas on the subject.
PS: I missed this functionality, especially of directly insertion of C macros, while implementing winds
Levenshtein distance (to be finished soon).
Hi @arthurmaciel!
Thanks for the feedback. Agree c-code
is rather limiting since it only allows inserting code within a Scheme function. It probably makes sense to either rename it or allow insertions at the top-level too and compile those differently.
Regarding the top-level it is possible to use include-c-header
to include arbitrary top-level code. This is kind of a hack though. See: https://github.com/cyclone-scheme/simple-http-server/blob/master/http-server.sld#L8
Looking forward to your update! Sorry if the tooling is slowing you down / getting in your way. Please let me know if there are any other improvements that could help.
@justinethier, the code was already done using exactly the strategy you mentioned (include-c-header
) and the tooling was not slowing me down in anyway.
About c-code
, if I can be of any help, please let me know.
EG: perhaps
c-code
could be used to define C functions, rather than merely inserting code into a generated lambda function.Alternatively we could add a new construct if there are implementation details that prevent
c-code
from working in this capacity.