AndreaCrotti
commented
5 years ago Ah interesting with this change it works on Clj but not for Cljs, which I guess makes sense. I can just delete the two assertions otherwise if they are not that useful.
Closed AndreaCrotti closed 4 years ago
AndreaCrotti
commented
5 years ago Ah interesting with this change it works on Clj but not for Cljs, which I guess makes sense. I can just delete the two assertions otherwise if they are not that useful.
The two tests below were not actually testing anything atm, since there was just 1 argument passed to
=(which I noticed just by running eastwood) I just made them pass now, but the actual result of the call is not what is said there, so I'm not sure this is correct.