Closed sophokles73 closed 10 years ago
is it a fix for issue #12 ?
Julien, issue #12 should already have been fixed by a previous commit (at least the corresponding code was already present). I have added a test case, though, for validating this and have also reduced the visibility of the setters of Client in order to restrict access to the Client registration to the ClientRegistry (by means of using a ClientUpdate object)
Regarding the "this." prefixing: personally, I am not that much in favor of those as well. It seems that I have been using the wrong formatting rules, i.e. not the ones contained in the project. I have changed my settings now so that any future code changes should be formatted properlly according to your settings. Sorry for that.
BTW I will be at the IoTCON in Berlin in September. I have seen that you will conduct a session there. I would be glad to get to know you in person there and also talk to Benjamin again :-)
no problem for the formatting. BTW can you rebase your branch? git hub complaints it cannot be merged. great news! looking forward to meet you :)
I have merged master's HEAD into my branch, i.e. it should now be possible to merge in GitHub...
Llooks good. Thanks! I'll fix format issues, validte, tostring and other nit-picking and integrate it this afternoon.
Only update registration properties for which a non-null value has beenprovided