Add leshan client

[jschloman]

This is the first merge of our leshan client with the caveat that we need to resolve the last thing in leshan-client-standalone (which we will look at this evening). But we wanted to get this out to you so you can take a look at the work :)

-The Zatarians (John, Simon, Josh, Andrew)

[jvermillard]

Thanks guys! This is really massive so it will take some time to be fully reviewed. First thing to do for you, the legal annoying stuff:

• license headers on every files (yes even .xml files)
• add a "copyright zebra ... in the licnese header of every files you touched
• remove those DDF XML files, the license is dubious, we created an alternative json (objectspec.json)

[jvermillard]

So this is really a MASSIVE pull-request, thanks :)

After looking at the code with manu & simon, we would like to propose this plan:

Short plan for merging:

• use the core object-model(objectspec package), kill the OMA XML files
• remove unused class, maybe it's for a future implementation but it's really confusing
• rename leshan-client-standalone to leshan-client-example I think we can merge directly in the master since there is not a lot of dependency

Long term plan after merging:

• start using it for end-to-end client to server blackbox testing
• unify the API between the client and server

What do you think?

[Areontar]

So this is really a MASSIVE pull-request, thanks :)

After looking at the code with manu & simon, we would like to propose this plan:

Short plan for merging:

use the core object-model(objectspec package), kill the OMA XML files remove unused class, maybe it's for a future implementation but it's really confusing rename leshan-client-standalone to leshan-client-example I think we can merge directly in the master since there is not a lot of dependency Long term plan after merging:

start using it for end-to-end client to server blackbox testing unify the API between the client and server What do you think?

I think thats a good way forward and would help the upgrade as they are incrementally pull-requested, it would make things easier

[joshlarson]

I'm all for that. I think we've already removed the unused classes (although I'm sure I missed some) and killed the OMA XML files, so that leaves renaming (and killing the OMA XML files).

:+1: Thanks! :)

[joshlarson]

I think we've covered the short-term items you asked for, but now there are conflicts that need to be resolved. I can take a look at those later today and then we should be good to go :D

[joshlarson]

I just rebased against the new master. No more conflicts :)