Closed nicolo-ribaudo closed 5 years ago
Hi @nicolo-ribaudo , thanks for making a contribution to this repo! Sure, happy to add the test (it's not that much in this case).
In case we see a lot more regressions further up in the reg* stack, maybe it would make sense to fix the way the package (in this case the regjsgen
) pulls the tests and then apply the new test case in addition to the downloaded ones local to that package. Given that the requested change is small and adding extra infra for having additional extended tests in regjsgen
sounds like a big overhead at the current state, I decided it's better to just include the test here.
Note: Looking at the issue raised in 1 later. Once resolved I will create a new release. If you don't hear back form me within 3 days, please bump me!
In case we see a lot more regressions further up in the reg* stack, maybe it would make sense to fix the way the package (in this case the regjsgen) pulls the tests and then apply the new test case in addition to the downloaded ones local to that package
:+1: I 100% agree with you
Note: Looking at the issue raised in 1 later. Once resolved I will create a new release. If you don't hear back form me within 3 days, please bump me!
Ok, thanks!
Created a new release v0.6.1 incorporating this fix and pushed to npm. Sorry for the long delay.
In https://github.com/mathiasbynens/regexpu-core/pull/29#issuecomment-533523513 I found a bug in
regjsgen
. I fixed it (https://github.com/bnjmnt4n/regjsgen/pull/13), but when I wanted to add a test I found out that it downloads the test from this reporitory. Even if it's not a bug with your package, I think that a test for a previously untested behavior could be accepted? :stuck_out_tongue: