Closed KronosTheLate closed 3 years ago
No reference no, the reason was that concentrations are often denoted by square brackets, e.g., [X], so that [X] [mol/m^3] would look uglier IMHO than [X] (mol/m^3).
I don't feel strongly about this or about changing it to square brackets. Not sure what would be the best way to implement it as an option. What do you think @jw3126 ?
FWIW, I mostly use this package for quick figures, where it's useful to see the units quickly, but where the details are not too important. I don't use it for final publication-quality figures, which is when I would pay attention to details like that.
This is the line for reference:
Same thing here. I use this for quick plotting and don't feel too strongly about details like this. There could be a keyword argument, e.g. render_label
or render_guide
of signature (label::AbstractString, u) -> AbstractString
that allows customizing this.
We could provide square_brackets
, round_brackets
functions for convenience.
using UnitfulRecipes: round_brackets, square_brackets
plot(data..., xguide="velocity", render_label=round_brackets) # default
plot(data..., xguide="velocity", render_label=square_brackets)
Is there any reference to why normal brackets
()
are used to denote the units on the plot axes? I am used to the convension of square backets[]
, and the only think I found from quick googling is that one should denote e.g. time astime / s
, which seems worse to me. Could there potentially be a flag or optional argument one can use to change the default?