Is `~/.npm-rfc/` a better temp folder than `/tmp/ietf-rfc`?

[leesei]

I'm also thinking of allowing the user to export and bookmark rfcs, it would be better if there is a user's folder for this app.

[jwerle]

or ~/.rfc? I like the idea of moving away from using $TMPDIR

[leesei]

I'm afraid the ~/.rfc namespace is too generic and might cause a conflict. Also, some programs use .d suffix to denote a directory, I also recommend that.

Here are my updated suggestions:

~/.npm-rfc.d/
~/.node-rfc.d/
~/.rfc.d/

[jwerle]

I think leaving npm and node out of the name is a good idea. These aren't RFCs for node or npm... ~/.rfc.d could work

[leesei]

K, are you free to implement this? I can help within week's time.

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Joseph Werle notifications@github.com wrote:

I think leaving npm and node out of the name is a good idea. These aren't RFCs for node or npm... ~/.rfc.d could work

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jwerle/rfc/issues/4#issuecomment-99948612.

[jwerle]

I'm very busy for the next week. I will happily accept a PR!

[leesei]

K. I'll do this first and then my other improvements.

Thank you, I would have to write a similar tool from scratch otherwise.

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Joseph Werle notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm very busy for the next week. I will happily accept a PR!

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/jwerle/rfc/issues/4#issuecomment-99954038.

[jwerle]

No problem !

[leesei]

Merged #6.