For some figures, it seems that the tool isnt working properly:
MSE loss for kiba edge types:
Figure
Issues:
simple-anm is not significant and that bar should belong to binary-anm
binary-anm bar is actually ** and this bar should be fore binary-af2
Actual Values:
MSE:
binary vs. simple: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:3.095e-01 U_stat=7.000e+00
*anm vs. binary: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:7.937e-03 U_stat=2.500e+01
af2 vs. anm: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:2.222e-01 U_stat=6.000e+00
*af2 vs. binary: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:3.175e-02 U_stat=2.300e+01
anm vs. simple: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:1.508e-01 U_stat=2.000e+01
af2 vs. simple: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:3.095e-01 U_stat=1.800e+01
MSE loss for PDBbind feature types:
Figure
Issues:
nomsa-msa bar belongs to nomsa-shannon
msa-esm bar belongs to shannon-esm
Actual Values:
MSE:
msa vs. ESM: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:6.905e-01 U_stat=1.500e+01
nomsa vs. msa: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:5.556e-02 U_stat=3.000e+00
nomsa vs. ESM: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:9.524e-02 U_stat=4.000e+00
*shannon vs. ESM: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:1.587e-02 U_stat=2.400e+01
*nomsa vs. shannon: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:7.937e-03 U_stat=0.000e+00
*shannon vs. msa: Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test two-sided, P_val:3.175e-02 U_stat=2.300e+01
For some figures, it seems that the tool isnt working properly:
MSE loss for kiba edge types:
Figure
Issues:
Actual Values:
MSE loss for PDBbind feature types:
Figure
Issues:
Actual Values: