search

jyztintan / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Leading zeros required for valid date #13

Open jyztintan opened 2 months ago

jyztintan commented 2 months ago

While explicitly stated in UG, this is still a feature flaw as it inconveniences users and hinders their efficiency

image.png

nus-se-bot commented 2 months ago

Team's Response

We follow a conventional and intuitive format that has minimal inconvenience to the user.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: I think that the format that the team has considered might not be the most "conventional and intuitive".

Users may naturally omit leading zeros, as this is a common practice in many real-world scenarios. The strict enforcement of including leading zeros in date inputs may not align with the intuitive patterns of user behavior, leading to errors and frustration and hindering efficiency.

The application's usability can be greatly improved by addressing this issue, reducing unnecessary friction for the user, and ensuring that the tool is as efficient and intuitive as possible by allowing both inputs (with and without leading zeros).