Closed ddobrev closed 6 years ago
In addition, the file with the old name can be deleted in Git. @jzoss what do you think about such a feature?
It would not be bad. Din't think it would be that hard to implement.
OK, great. I can now see I've requested the feature with two different approaches - add + delete vs rename. It makes no difference to me so please select whichever one you consider optimal.
Hello @jzoss , how have you been doing? Do you still develop this project? I can see no commits later than August. It would be a real shame if you no longer have time for it, the integration with TortoiseGit alone makes it much better than MS's built-in source control provider. But if you do, do you think you could start with this feature?
Yeah I'm still around 😀. I moved in August and I just never caught up. I still plan on adding new features .
I am really happy to hear it. I hope you are happy too with your new home.
@jzoss Hello again. :) How have you been, any plans to continue development? This add-in needs your brilliant work.
Yeah I was starting to look at it again.. Just need to figure out what to do first. :)
Excellent, makes me really happy because after this one I have some more issues for you. :)
Ok I'm back.. This will be fixed in 1.7.3 .. should also be in a pre-release in the release tab
Thank you! I am patient, I can wait for the official release. :)
By the way, does it also delete the file with the old name? If not, I guess you could still cope with just one operation, it would simply have to be Git rename instead of add.
Get pumped.. v1.7.3 was just published
Works just fine. Directly renaming in Git and then displaying a single change would be a nice touch, though.
Similar to https://github.com/jzoss/Git-Source-Control-Provider/issues/53 , a file renamed in a project - or in a solution - could be added to, or renamed in, Git as well. @jzoss what do you think?