TIPP: Object Sections should have well-defined names

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This issue came out of Linport discussions.

Several people pointed out that there's no reason for sections to have 
arbitrary names; there should be a well-defined name associated with each 
section type.  (ie, the "bilingual" section should always be called 
"bilingual".)  This is particularly true in conjunction with the changes 
suggested in Issue 18.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by tingley on 29 May 2012 at 5:36

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I am increasingly of the opinion that this change doesn't need to be made - 
there is no benefit to maintaining two parallel sets of unique identifiers (URI 
and name). Furthermore, the name is really an implementation detail specific to 
the current package implementation, where as the URI is an abstract property of 
the model.

I'm going to push this suggestion to the various parties and see what they 
think.

Original comment by tingley on 23 Jul 2012 at 3:48

• Added labels: Milestone-TIPP1.5

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by tingley on 2 Mar 2013 at 3:56

• Changed state: Fixed