search

kadaster / klic-win

https://kadaster.nl/zakelijk/registraties/landelijke-voorzieningen/klic
21 stars 16 forks source link

Unreferenced ExtraGeometrie in "Levering_18O000687_1" #61

Closed nielsgerrits closed 6 years ago

nielsgerrits commented 6 years ago

Can someone confirm if the reference from Duct nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_duct00001-p to ExtraGeometrie nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_xg00001-d is correct? See GI_gebiedsinformatielevering_18O000687_1.xml line 1753.

Looks like ExtraGeometrie nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_xg00001-p is not related to anything else. It is also not visible in Klic-viewer 4.3.0.0.

Duct nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_duct00001-d relates to ExtraGeometrie nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_xg00001-d. Duct nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_duct00001-f relates to ExtraGeometrie nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_xg00001-f. Duct nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_duct00001-p relates to ExtraGeometrie nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_xg00001-d. I think this is a typo.

File link: https://github.com/kadaster/klic-win/blob/master/Uitleveren/Voorbeelden/Levering_18O000687_1.zip

Not sure if I should report this anyway and / or report it here so please be gentle. If I should report elsewhere please let me know.

Thanks.

Edit: Same thing happens with nl.imkl-TS1392.BGI_xg00001-p, line 8290.

herman-vandenberg commented 6 years ago

The example 18O000687 is created by using test-accounts of KLIC (to be recognized as "bronhouder" TSxxxx). By using these test-accounts lots of special test-cases were handled to check whether our KLIC-software was working correct, even with situations which you wouldn't suspect in a 'normal' production situation. As such, the data you are looking at, is not originally delivered by a real asset-holder.

Let's zoom in to your remark. The relation from Duct nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_duct00001-p to ExtraGeometrie nl.imkl-TS1381.BGI_xg00001-d is indeed a typo. Nevertheless the data is syntactically correct, according to the current version of IMKL v1.2.1.

nielsgerrits commented 6 years ago

Thanks for your answer.