search

kadaster / klic-win

https://kadaster.nl/zakelijk/registraties/landelijke-voorzieningen/klic
20 stars 16 forks source link

inNetwork 1:N relation in klics #86

Closed szmucha closed 6 months ago

szmucha commented 4 years ago

We are experiencing delivery of the klics which contains 1:N relation between cable and Network. Particular example klics: 20G158360; 20G158610; Utility Company: KL0004.

The general case has been described and discussed here: https://github.com/Geonovum/imkl2015-review/issues/269 but I believe that as nothing regarding the model will be updated short term, the validation would be helpful.

herman-vandenberg commented 4 years ago

@szmucha We will analyse these KLIC-requests and consider your suggestion. You will hear from us.

herman-vandenberg commented 4 years ago

@szmucha We analyzed KLIC-request 20G158360 and confirm your conclusion about the 1:N relationship. This is not according to the work-around which was agreed by the technical committee and confirmed by KGO/BAO. See #181 We have forwarded the analysis to the relevant network operator and urgently requested to take action as soon as possible.

szmucha commented 4 years ago

@herman-vandenberg did you received any feedback on this?

herman-vandenberg commented 4 years ago

@szmucha After asking again, we have just got feedback from the service provider of the relevant network operator: "The issues were discussed with the network operator and we are still waiting for an agreement to be allowed to carry out the work. If there is an agreement, we will first realize this on the test environment before going to production."

FuatAkdeniz commented 1 year ago

TSC KLIC 25 november 2022: Dit is behandeld in issue https://github.com/Geonovum/imkl2015-review/issues/269 en zal derhalve gesloten worden.