kadaster / klic-win

https://kadaster.nl/zakelijk/registraties/landelijke-voorzieningen/klic
21 stars 16 forks source link

KL1051 data doesn't contain "Telecommunicatiekabel" #87

Closed szmucha closed 3 years ago

szmucha commented 4 years ago

On the number of klics (~300 verified) there is no Telecommunicatiekabel objects for KL1051 - which provides mainly the datatransport I think - just "Kabelbeds" and "Mantelbuises" which I believe doesn't provide all the data about cables. So my question is if this is right?

I can imagine the situation that there is only "Kabelbed" without Cable inside - but I haven't found even single case with Cable inside.

szmucha commented 4 years ago

And sample klics where I've found this situation: "19G468490" "19G469551" "19G540023" "19G606450" "19G660236" "20C006611" "20C006612" "20C007347" "20C008148" "20C008287" "20C008410" "20C009931" "20C009933" "20C009934" "20C010928" "20C010938" "20G000101" "20G006480" "20G034307" "20G038222" "20G049619" "20G064502" "20G072932" "20G107941" "20G114638" "20G119864" "20G119984" "20G129284" "20G129374" "20G129379" "20G130003" "20G132041" "20G133306" "20G133401" "20G134297" "20G134349" "20G134376" "20G135476" "20G136192" "20G136305" "20G136406" "20G136452" "20G137964" "20G138092" "20G138470" "20G138699" "20G138778" "20G139060" "20G140003" "20G141489" "20G142942" "20G149994" "20G158360" "20G164847" "20G164963" "20G165531" "20G169601" "20G169605" "20G169608" "20G169609" "20G169611" "20G169614" "20G169615" "20G169616" "20G169617" "20G171630" "20G174885" "20G176306" "20G179005" "20G181291" "20G181301" "20G181303" "20G181304" "20G181306" "20G181308" "20G181312" "20G181316" "20G181320" "20G181325" "20G181326" "20G181329" "20G181331" "20G181334" "20G181336" "20G181338" "20G181341" "20G181342" "20G181343" "20G181345" "20G181346" "20G181350" "20G181352" "20G181353" "20G181355" "20G181358" "20G181360" "20G181369" "20G181371" "20G181376" "20G181377" "20G181379" "20G187912" "20G190639" "20G190714" "20G191731" "20G199672" "20G200297" "20G201672" "20G202047" "20G202051" "20G202053" "20G202057" "20G202257" "20G202258" "20G202335" "20G202343" "20G202377" "20G202399" "20G202402" "20G202408" "20G202440" "20G202445" "20G202446" "20G202453" "20G202454" "20G202457" "20G202463" "20G202464" "20G202465" "20G202466" "20G202469" "20G202473" "20G202475" "20G202476" "20G202478" "20G202481" "20G202482" "20G202485" "20G202486" "20G202489" "20G202491" "20G202494" "20G202497" "20G202515" "20G202522" "20G202524" "20G202525" "20G202528" "20G202536" "20G202542" "20G202550" "20G202551" "20G203273" "20G212010" "20G217088" "20G218414" "20G218416" "20G218420" "20G219972" "20G226298" "20G230904" "20G231561" "20G231578" "20O021510" "20O021519" "20O024439" "20O024856" "20O026390" "20O028080" "20O029878" "20O029881" "20O033271" "20O033274"

herman-vandenberg commented 4 years ago

@szmucha I completely understand your confusion. This type of implementation is not what you would suspect, but is accepted by the sector and is mainly used by telecom-providers. The telecommunication-cables (which can be hundreds and more) are bundled and then defined als "Kabelbed" with an obligated attribute "aantalKabelsLeidingen". The solitair "Telecommunicatiekabel" is not used in this situation...