Closed kai-tub closed 3 years ago
From what I can tell, most main distributions come with lualatex
and xelatex
support out of the box.
Maybe it is sufficient to point out the usage of lualatex
.
But I will still investigate if I can keep it backward-compatible.
Would actually also help to actually fix #52 Generally, the underlying font support would be a lot better.
After reading the lualatex documentation, I believe that it would be best to completely switch to lualatex
.
I think it would add more confusion if pdflatex
stays supported. Specifically removing inputenc
may not seem obvious.
So this is going to be a major change, for better or for worse...
Also think about adding microtype
to the default settings.
It adds micro-typographical enhancements and works very well for documents
OP in #58 recommends TeX Gyre's
sans serif fonts.
If I successfully transition to lualatex
I can think about integrating it and adding fallbacks.
Decided against microtype
, as it does not play well with Japanese text.
I wanted to keep the template as open as possible and not force anybody to use an alternative to pdfLaTeX, since it is commonly installed. But I also want people to be able to use the template across the world without having to modify the code support languages such as Korean, Japanese, or Chinese. If it is possible, I will try to retain a "pdfLaTeX compliant" setting otherwise a major version bump is required. Multi-lingual support is more important than ease-of-use.
At least, I think it is...