Open kaihendry opened 9 years ago
I can see this works technically, but I don't think it's a great solution. You'd have to grep as many times as a user had changed handles, and you'd have to start off by finding out what those handles were. Would it even be that easy to filter grep results by user id?
I think ideally you'd use the id in place of the handle behind the scenes and do a dynamic lookup when you wanted to show a user a handle.
Of course you then have to consider @mentions... :(
So you say store tweets by id (e.g. 100 & 200) and then in this case of sweepyface (for e.g.), the UX is when someone goes to:
Is that what you envision?
No, I was imagining that the user would automatically be taken to the log of the current sweepyface. But I guess there's a hole in that when a user deactivates their account.
e.g. The controversial http://greptweet.com/u/sweepyface/sweepyface.txt log is being appended to.
Solution would be track user's unique numeric id instead of username. https://twitter.com/jamiekitson/status/536080928624607232
I don't think it's a big deal to add another column with this info. Of course people depending on the stability of our CSV format might be a little put out be a column, but oh well!
WDYT @JamieKitson ?