Command summary does not correspond to detailed commands

[kaijie0102]

[nus-se-script]

Team's Response

As suggested, the command summary is meant to provide a brief summary of the various commands that we have implemented, thus it does not 100% correspond to the detailed commands as we tried to summarise them in such a way for the user to be able to make the most out of a simple bullet-point listing. Thus in the command summary, all commands are included, but their examples differ as we tried to give a wide variety of different approaches as inputs. For the full detailed requirements of each command, they are listed specifically under each command in the UG.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Command Summary does not contains all parameters supported

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.

---

Expected:

• Command Summary contains all parameters that a command supports.

Actual:

• Optional parameters are not clearly shown, or even ignored.

Screenshots:

---

_{[original: nus-cs2113-AY2324S1/pe-interim#892] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]}

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

No details provided by team.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

• [x] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: I agree that it is a duplicate, but I do not agree for it to be rejected

Rubrics mention that features' "descriptions should match the product precisely". I feel that leaving out parameters of functions does not make the description precise

---