Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Here are some procmem outputs. You'll see lots of MB allocated in
/dalvik-heap-bitmap/mark/2 and /dev/pmem_camera (strange ? apv does nothing
with the
camera ?!). On the emulator I see the same leaks except for /dev/pmem_camera.
The leaks cannot be seen in the DDMS VM heap monitor, so it might be a system
bug...
Original comment by ldro...@gmail.com
on 1 May 2010 at 8:50
Attachments:
Would it be possible to reduce the memory usage by supporting viewing in
monochrome? For most text PDF document, color is not needed. Further more, APV
uses RGBA all the time and most devices do RGB565 only. Would this help on the
rendering performance too?
Original comment by yuanc...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2011 at 12:28
The change from RGBA to RGB_565 has indeed been made.
I also added a grayscale option. I don't see any performance improvement with
it, but I suppose it decreases memory usage.
Original comment by arpruss
on 27 Jul 2011 at 3:04
I also experimented with compressing the tiles. Using Android's png
compression was too slow. But I think that so many pdfs are full of blank
space that one could write short native-code run-length
decompression/compression routines that would help a fair amount on most tiles.
Original comment by arpruss
on 27 Jul 2011 at 3:40
This has something to do with image rendering. On an image-heavy document, I
see 7-8 mb added to the memory usage each time I go down a page. This is
obviously way more than our cache holds. And it doesn't get freed when you
load another document.
I think mupdf is caching data.
Original comment by arpruss
on 31 Jul 2011 at 3:45
I fixed the leaks. There were three:
1. allocation of pages
2. pdf->glyph_cache
3. pdf->xref
The big one was pdf->xref->store. To prevent uncontrolled growth, I now kill
the store after every tile render. A better way to proceed would be to age it
gracefully, but I will leave that for later optimization.
Original comment by arpruss
on 31 Jul 2011 at 7:46
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ldro...@gmail.com
on 30 Apr 2010 at 6:03