Closed ams-tschoening closed 7 years ago
… a type. This is related to #5 and should be a useful starting point to not force users to handle the underluying byte[] of a type on their in some kind of wrapper class or such.
Thanks! One note: probably we should use more modern "underlying" spelling of that word ;)
… a type. This is related to #5 and should be a useful starting point to not force users to handle the underluying byte[] of a type on their in some kind of wrapper class or such.