Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
This sounds like a good idea. How would this be integrated into secrets?
Would
secrets link against a library that can parse the xml files, or would secrets
parse
the files itself?
Can you provide an example xml file that would be used for password management
type
apps?
Thanks.
Original comment by roge...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2010 at 3:42
Original comment by roge...@gmail.com
on 22 May 2010 at 4:14
My understanding is that there is a libopensync, so Secrets would need to write
a
plugin that converts from Secrets format to something more generic.
I don't know a lot about the technical aspects, but I don't think that any other
password programs use OpenSync -- probably because no others use it yet.
I would expect that the OpenSync devs would be keen to help you do this. The
list is
here:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensync-devel
Original comment by lunatick...@gmail.com
on 7 Jun 2010 at 8:41
I can only hope you're not thinking about adding a network sync. I really that
warm fuzzy feeling of safety when the application I use to store some of my
secrets does not even have the permission to send anything over the network.
We can argue that it's an open source app, so everybody would see if it was
doing something wrong, but network access would still make me feel uneasy. In
the end it's not like someone is screening every update?
Paranoid? Maybe a bit. But there's plenty of other applications that support
more or less elaborate synchronisation scenarios. Personally, I like the
simplicity of this application as is — just stores stuff, and exports them on
the card, if you ask it to. I hope such option will stay there forever.
Original comment by pitk...@gmail.com
on 24 Oct 2010 at 9:13
Hi pitkali,
You are not paranoid, nor are you alone in getting that warm and fuzzy feeling
about apps that don't have internet access. At this point internet access is
not a permission that Secrets will ever ask for.
Sync'ing with the "desktop" is something that lots of people have asked for
though, and even I sometimes wished there was something like that. I've been
thinking about a solution to this problem for a little while now (and because
of these security issues I'm moving deliberately slowly). The solution is
along the lines of installing a second, totally separate app that privately
communicates with Secrets and syncs with some online service (not a desktop).
The bottom line then is this: those who don't need sync'ing can install Secrets
only, with no ability for your secrets to reach the internet. Those who want
sync'ing would need to install another app as well, with the knowledge that
this configuration will send your secrets to an online destination of their
choice.
Does this still give you that warm and fuzzy feeling?
Original comment by ro...@tawacentral.net
on 24 Oct 2010 at 2:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
lunatick...@gmail.com
on 5 May 2010 at 2:25