Closed tenzap closed 10 months ago
I think we need the agreement of @back2arie in order to re-licence to GPL-2-or-later
. @back2arie Maybe you could share your views since you are the original author of project?
Dear All,
Yes, let's do that. I guess we can't help it since currently we are "bound" to Gammu. I was not aware of the incompatibilities before, thanks for pointing that out.
Currently kalkun is licensed under
GPL-3-or-later
. However, kalkun is closely bound to Gammu which isGPL-2-only
. Moreover, some of the code/files in kalkun is also under GPL2 license.For example: application/plugins/sms_to_twitter/libraries/Epi.php application/plugins/sms_to_twitter/libraries/Twitter.php application/sql/mysql/pbk_gammu.sql application/sql/pgsql/pbk_gammu.sql application/sql/sqlite/pbk_gammu.sql
The problem is that these licenses (
GPL-3-or-later
&GPL-2-only
) are actually not compatible as per https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#AllCompatibilityI think Kalkun was wrongly licensed under
GPL-3-or-later
because Gammu's license doesn't permit that. I suggest to relicense kalkun underGPL-2-or-later
.I would agree with this, what do you think @kingster, @back2arie, @pandigresik ?