Open kalmarek opened 3 years ago
I use the fact that the output is in row-echelon here: https://github.com/jump-dev/SumOfSquares.jl/blob/master/src/Certificate/Symmetry/wedderburn.jl#L111 However, if it's just internal and the users get a row-based one I have no objection
@blegat I think we just happen to do it row-based by a historical accident now (
row_echelon_form
). I think all of this should be rewritten tocolumn_echelon_form
anyway, but this is just internals; users will face row-basedsymmetry_adapted_basis
I think it should be changed to column-based. Any objections?