Open kangqiao322 opened 1 year ago
Severity should be verylow as it is a minor typo and a documentation bug
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: This error should be at least low in severity as it can confuse and mislead the developer, not just a cosmetic issue. The developer might mistake that he/she needs get the list again with the list command in the application after inputting an invalid index when reality he/she just needs to enter the delete command again with a valid index.
Shouldn't the user resume from step 2 after keying in an invalid index? I don't think he needs to relist the list, he just straight resumes from step 2 by keying in a new index instead.