Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
patch for wwwsqldesigner.js
had to use an other .patch generator (because googlecode's online generator
cant add as a comment, only create new "issue", afaik -.-
hopefully compatible, i don't know..
Original comment by divinity76@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2012 at 4:34
Attachments:
patch for /hg/locale/en.xml
since i only know norwegian/swedish/dannish/english, im not suited to update
the others..
Original comment by divinity76@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2012 at 4:40
Attachments:
last notes:
code based on the AUTO_INCREASE code.
still needs to be ported to the other sql databases that support UNSIGNED types
(i would be surprised if not all sql databases support it though :p)
still needs to be translated
Original comment by divinity76@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2012 at 4:43
btw here's live preview
https://divinity76-wwwsqldesigner-testbed.googlecode.com/hg/index.html
Original comment by divinity76@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2012 at 5:06
I am not sure I want to support this. According to
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/numeric-type-attributes.html, the
UNSIGNED attribute is nonstandard and wwwsqldesigner aims to be as DB agnostic
as possible...
I understand that having an unsigned data type might be reasonable, but I am
currently not aware of any correct way to implement such feature in
wwwsqldesigner (you patch adds a checkbox to all, even non-numeric, data
types...).
Original comment by ondrej.zara
on 24 Jun 2012 at 3:38
ok,i see.
(btw the current auto increment code also put a checkbox to all :p)
for the record, some google'ing, turns out
Supported by:
MySQL
SQLite ( http://www.sqlite.org/lang_createtable.html )
NOT supported by:
CUBRID (
http://www.cubrid.org/manual/831/en/Numeric%20Types-Definition%20and%20Character
istics )
MSSQL
Oracle
PostgreSQL
(this was a surprise for me, i believed "signed or not" was a standard thing, i
was wrong)
Original comment by divinity76@gmail.com
on 24 Jun 2012 at 9:50
According to http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/create-table.html, "auto
increment" is valid for all data types :-)
Original comment by ondrej.zara
on 25 Jun 2012 at 8:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
divinity76@gmail.com
on 19 Jun 2012 at 4:23Attachments: