Closed ghost closed 3 years ago
5.75/6 The grayscale hovering over feature was a very cool addition to the website. I also enjoyed the explanation of the code and how everything works. The clarity of your voice was difficult to understand and you were speaking too fast. But overall the video was perfect length.
This video was well done. I thought that the projects that you worked on were interesting and you've shown effort in the minilabs/tangibles. However, I did not see much mention of how the work done was supported by Collegeboard. The score I will give is a 5.5 out of 6.
The video displayed the different minilabs you worked on, and how you applied college board technicals to other pages. I especially liked how you implemented the RGB grayscale into the Samsung page. However, you spent too much time talking about the logic gates, and you were missing the image files to the logic gate pictures. You also could have talked more about the relationship between your code and college board materials. 5.25/6.
Watched the video. Usually you don't show troubles on video, it would be nice if you fixed it up. Probably you did not add images to project if it did not pull. This distracted from you talking more about code. On Samsung page you talked a lot about CSS and using built in features for things like gray scale. In general you are missing relationships between what you are doing and associating with CB, this was main purpose of this activity. 4.75/6
I see you understood requirements of video from comments. However, when we give comments it is supposed to lead to additional conversation and collaboration. You are somewhat direct to checkbox but not to general purpose in comments. 1.5/2
William's Video