It seems like this is really slow... maybe because we have to create new threads for each in 1..150? If we split this range by the number of threads we wouldn't have to keep creating them.
Also, does Fiddle::Function.call only allow one thread to run at a time?
It seems like this is really slow... maybe because we have to create new threads for each in 1..150? If we split this range by the number of threads we wouldn't have to keep creating them.
Also, does Fiddle::Function.call only allow one thread to run at a time?