Closed kassane closed 5 months ago
I think http.zig predates that type. I'm also not sure what the enum gets you. If someone has a reason to use status code 111, I don't intend to make it hard for them,.
I think http.zig predates that type. I'm also not sure what the enum gets you.
Again, it's not a problem for me. And I agree with what has been said.
It's just the convenience of the type.
Even in your tests, there may be non-existent status numbers from std.http.Status
. In my fork, changing this would require completely changing some points of the status tests.
Hi @karlseguin,
My question is
In: https://github.com/karlseguin/http.zig/blob/1762121e5ff1791d5405c4484f5958b329eb9c39/src/response.zig#L27
Why not
std.http.Status
? It's [enum(u10)
].Suggestion: Open discussion and transfer the questions.