test/e2e/karmadactl_test.go: test options command

[mohamedawnallah]

Description

In this commit, we test karmadactl options on listing all available global options successfully and returning an error for the invalid flag in options.

What type of PR is this?

/kind failing-test

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Part of #4544

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[codecov-commenter]

:warning: Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 28.26%. Comparing base (5e3e5ad) to head (cb43384).

:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #5221 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 28.25% 28.26% ======================================= Files 632 632 Lines 43739 43739 ======================================= + Hits 12360 12361 +1 Misses 30478 30478 + Partials 901 900 -1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/karmada-io/karmada/pull/5221/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=karmada-io) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/karmada-io/karmada/pull/5221/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=karmada-io) | `28.26% <ø> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=karmada-io#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[karmada-bot]

@mohamedawnallah: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to [this](https://github.com/karmada-io/karmada/pull/5221#issuecomment-2235790055): >/retest Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[mohamedawnallah]

/retest

[karmada-bot]

@mohamedawnallah: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to [this](https://github.com/karmada-io/karmada/pull/5221#issuecomment-2235791488): >/retest Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[zhzhuang-zju]

/retest ask @XiShanYongYe-Chang to take a look

[zhzhuang-zju]

LGTM, but you might solve the merge conflict first

[mohamedawnallah]

@zhzhuang-zju @XiShanYongYe-Chang Let's get this merged first #5210 since it is submitted first and rebase on it?

[mohamedawnallah]

I just rebased on the master branch in case of asynchronous merging for PRs. I will ask for review when GitHub CI tests finish!

[XiShanYongYe-Chang]

/assign @zhzhuang-zju @Vacant2333

[zhzhuang-zju]

/lgtm cc @XiShanYongYe-Chang @Vacant2333

[karmada-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: XiShanYongYe-Chang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[test/OWNERS](https://github.com/karmada-io/karmada/blob/master/test/OWNERS)~~ [XiShanYongYe-Chang] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment