Open Avihais12344 opened 1 month ago
Also I need to add the remove functionality, i would add it. Please don't close this PR.
Now added the remove!
Hi! Thanks for this PR. It would be very useful to have a general SQL implementation as a storage option, but I think it will make our storage solutions more complicated to maintain. So, I suggest continuing with the existing storage options and introducing the new one as a separate library. I’d be happy to add related libraries to hishel's documentation.
Why do you think it would be more complicated to maintain? You already have many options, we can replace the sqlite
one with this, and have more options like postgress
, mysql
and more. I think the maintenance is worth the cost. For some people, get SQL-ish DB is way easier then getting S3
or redis
.
Finally it passes!
Hello,
I was wondering, why there's no General SQL Storage. So I have added it.
I have used
SQLalchemy
for the task, and for some weird reason, it doesn't work withtrio
(async backend), but I think we can still add it.Thanks ahead for the help!