search

karthik / smb_git

A review paper describing how git can be used to improve reproducibility in science
85 stars 25 forks source link

Missing references: bib file needs updating #23

Open benmarwick opened 9 years ago

benmarwick commented 9 years ago

This is a great resource, along with your blog post, thanks for spelling it out so simply.

Seems that the git_ms.bib file here is a bit out of date, there are a bunch of missing references (I got this output when trying the apa.csl, the plos.csl didn't give any warnings: 

pandoc-citeproc: reference Peng2011 not found
pandoc-citeproc: reference VanNoorden2011a not found
pandoc-citeproc: reference Neylon2013 not found
pandoc-citeproc: reference Neylon2013 not found
pandoc-citeproc: reference Wilson2012 not found
pandoc-citeproc: reference Peng2011 not found
pandoc-citeproc: reference VanNoorden2011a not found
pandoc-citeproc: reference Neylon2013 not found
pandoc-citeproc: reference Neylon2013 not found
pandoc-citeproc: reference Wilson2012 not found
karthik commented 9 years ago

Thanks @benmarwick I'll look into this shortly. It's been ages since I looked at this repo

karthik commented 9 years ago

Hi Ben, Just getting a chance to look at it.

Seems that the git_ms.bib file here is a bit out of date, there are a bunch of missing references

I haven't updated any files in a long time so I'm not sure the references went missing. Everything still works correctly with plos.csl as you noted. Not sure what's going on with apa.csl. I'm currently out of bandwidth (October is a travel heavy month) to explore this right away but I'll revisit this once I get a chance. Apologies for the delay.

benmarwick commented 9 years ago

No worries at all, no hurry, I've learned quite a lot from looking at it already and the citations are a very minor issue.

In your current PDF in the repo the missing refs appear in the text as [@VanNoorden2011a], which is perhaps easier to miss than the ??? that I get in the text with the APA citation style.