search

kartoza / IGRAC-GGIS

https://ggis.un-igrac.org/
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
4 stars 5 forks source link

FAIR Metadata #724

Open EliVolsch opened 1 month ago

EliVolsch commented 1 month ago

Priory: Medium

Dear colleagues, we would like our resources to comply with the FAIR principles. However, my colleague Claudia ran some automatic checks to assess our compliance with FAIR and we appear to fail under several principles. What is you experience with FAIR and Geonode? Could you please assist us and indicate which metadata fields we need to fill in in order to be FAIR-compliant?

SterckxArnaud commented 1 month ago

Here are the results of the checks: image

SterckxArnaud commented 1 month ago

See also https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/blog/geonode-release-4-0-rc1/ image

clau1313 commented 1 month ago

Thanks @SterckxArnaud. You can access both FAIR assessment reports here:

https://fair-enough.semanticscience.org/evaluations/9d6bb58c0e778c76489a3fb986d1dd45f1a0737f https://fair-enough.semanticscience.org/evaluations/9da4005fa11f7ad3b5e7b7584458dfc25d6c1b4c

meomancer commented 1 month ago

I checked on geonode demo, they have also same FAIR values So should we update it by us or waiting geonode?

https://fair-enough.semanticscience.org/evaluations/6d32521f581cd82f2ca00c128f6a100408f5c043

cc @EliVolsch @SterckxArnaud @clau1313

SterckxArnaud commented 1 month ago

Hi Irwan, I am surprised by the relatively poor score of GeoNode. Do you know if it is a priority on Geonode's developers' side to improve it? Maybe @timlinux could advise us on this?

meomancer commented 1 month ago

Hi @SterckxArnaud Maybe we didn't test it correctly, as @gubuntu said that GeoNode metadata is already FAIR compliant. I think we need to research how above test is run

clau1313 commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @meomancer, thank you. In addition, I checked directly the GGMN site (instead of the DOI) and it scored quite low (3/22): https://fair-enough.semanticscience.org/evaluations/98710a320f49d1e339a4a75ab252815c173973fa

With this other tool the GGMN site doesn't score very high either: https://www.f-uji.net/index.php

Although we are unsure of what is the best test to use, we think that the FAIRness of GGMN can be improved.

Could you please look into how we might improve the FAIRness of GGMN (either using the tests above or any others you find more suitable)? Could you also provide a quote outlining what would be required to implement these improvements? Thanks!