Closed Jeremy-Prior closed 10 months ago
Comment from Matthew: " The ecosystem type, Critical Biodiversity Areas (please change this in the drop down list, at the moment it just says Biodiversity Areas) and the Protected Areas layer are not distinguishable at all. For the Ecosystems and CBAs, we should categorise the colours via the types listed in the attribute data. The PAs should also stand out more clearly. Also, is there not a way to ID what features are on what layer, much like the info arrow does on normal GIS software? We have to be able to see what we're looking and know what ecosystem type of category of CBA or the name of the PA is that we're looking at. " @Jeremy-Prior @timlinux
~The architecture should consist of PostGIS + Tegola + Maputnik Editor~ done
At the end the following should be delivered:
~The cartography should be monochrome so that user attention is focused on the visualisations and reports produced~ - done
~All tables should have spatial indexes~ - done
~ll columns that are used for filtering should be indexed~ - done
~Any column not needed for filtering or cartography should be removed from the tables~ done
~Use views to subset data as first preference~ - done
~Use materialised views as second preference~ - not needed
~All parcels should include the DG code or similar identifier that we can use to identify them with, and their parcel type~ done
~Only the NGI Imagery should be accessed as an external resource. All other resources should be 'in-house'~ done
~NGI Imagery can be off by default, Dimas will make it toggle-able in the product~ - done
Include design document accompanying the cartography: