Open BbolroC opened 1 year ago
@wainersm Do you know the history here?
@wainersm is it necessary to integrate s390x's into pr.yaml
and cc.yaml
? What do you think creating pr-s390x.yaml
and cc-s390x.yaml
(rationale: job name structure and configuration is quite different from x86_64's)?
@GabyCT may I ask for your opinion for the question above?
is it necessary to integrate s390x's into pr.yaml and cc.yaml? What do you think creating pr-s390x.yaml and cc-s390x.yaml (rationale: job name structure and configuration is quite different from x86_64's)?
Which feature do you think can be improved?
ATM, all CI jobs for s390x are handled manually. It would be better to put them under the job builder control.